NITUKUMAR HARPALSING CHAUDHARI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V N MODI — 1529/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010027662026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1531/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
1529/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
236
Police Station
KOSAMBA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NITUKUMAR HARPALSING CHAUDHARI
Adv. P H SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - V N MODI
Hearing History
Judge: 7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the bail application filed by Nitukumar Harpalsing Chairy under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. The accused was arrested in a case involving illegal foreign liquor (15,672 bottles worth ₹39,18,000) seized from a truck, with charges under IPC Sections 61(I), 81, 98(2), and 116(2). The court found that the investigation is ongoing with other accused still to be apprehended, and the accused posed a risk of tampering with evidence and absconding, warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the bail application filed by Nitukumar Harpalsing Chairy under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. The accused was arrested in a case involving illegal foreign liquor (15,672 bottles worth ₹39,18,000) seized from a truck, with charges under IPC Sections 61(I), 81, 98(2), and 116(2). The court found that the investigation is ongoing with other accused still to be apprehended, and the accused posed a risk of tampering with evidence and absconding, warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts