RAJESH KISHORCHANDRA KAPADIYA AUTHO PER OF TORRENT POWER LTD vs SHABBIRBHAI FARUKBHAI PATANI Advocate - M V JADAV — 1527/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 408. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010027622026

Filing Number

1528/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

1527/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 408
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KISHORCHANDRA KAPADIYA AUTHO PER OF TORRENT POWER LTD

    Adv. R D DOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHABBIRBHAI FARUKBHAI PATANI Advocate - M V JADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Surat, allowed Torrent Power Ltd.'s application to transfer three related criminal cases (37389/2021, 37393/2021, and 64819/2021) from different courts to a single court under Section 448 of the BNSS. The court found that all cases involved the same subject matter and common parties, and consolidation was necessary to prevent conflicting decisions and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Cases 37389/2021 and 37393/2021 from the 6th ACJM were transferred to the 4th ACJM where case 64819/2021 was already pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1527/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Surat, allowed Torrent Power Ltd.'s application to transfer three related criminal cases (37389/2021, 37393/2021, and 64819/2021) from different courts to a single court under Section 448 of the BNSS. The court found that all cases involved the same subject matter and common parties, and consolidation was necessary to prevent conflicting decisions and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Cases 37389/2021 and 37393/2021 from the 6th ACJM were transferred to the 4th ACJM where case 64819/2021 was already pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case