DEVENDRA ALIAS BUNTY KRISHNA MISHRA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI — 1494/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(1),. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010027102026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1495/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

1494/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11210045200160

Police Station

PANDESARA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439(1),
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302,34,120B,
ARMS ACT Section 25(1)(A)(A),27(3),
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135(1),

Petitioner(s)

DEVENDRA ALIAS BUNTY KRISHNA MISHRA

Adv. H N PATIL

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI

Hearing History

Judge: 7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

09-03-2026

HEARING

02-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the interim bail application of Devendra @ Bunty Krishana Murari Mishra, accused of murder under IPC Section 302 and Arms Act violations. The court found the charges serious, noted reasonable apprehensions of witness tampering and evidence destruction, and considered the applicant's involvement in six other criminal offences and prior bail rejections, concluding there was no cogent reason to grant temporary bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the interim bail application of Devendra @ Bunty Krishana Murari Mishra, accused of murder under IPC Section 302 and Arms Act violations. The court found the charges serious, noted reasonable apprehensions of witness tampering and evidence destruction, and considered the applicant's involvement in six other criminal offences and prior bail rejections, concluding there was no cogent reason to grant temporary bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case