APARNATHI HITESHBHAI SHIVABHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 1490/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010027042026

Filing Number

1491/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

1490/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

108

Police Station

UTRAN POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(I),75(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,11(1)(6),12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.APARNATHI HITESHBHAI SHIVABHAI

    Adv. K N DANKHARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of a 22-year-old accused charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act. The court found prima facie evidence of serious allegations involving sexual abuse and abduction of a minor victim, and determined that releasing the accused on bail would hinder the ongoing investigation at its crucial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1490/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of a 22-year-old accused charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act. The court found prima facie evidence of serious allegations involving sexual abuse and abduction of a minor victim, and determined that releasing the accused on bail would hinder the ongoing investigation at its crucial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case