SUSHILKUMAR MAHAVIRPRASAD JOSHI vs Government of Gujarat — 1474/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010026732026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1476/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
1474/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUSHILKUMAR MAHAVIRPRASAD JOSHI
Adv. N A SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Sushil Mahavirprasad Joshi, accused in a fraud case involving obtaining textile goods worth several crores without payment under sections 406, 409, 420, 120B, and 114 IPC. The court found the allegations grave and serious, noting prima facie evidence of systematic pre-planned fraudulent activity, ongoing investigation with pending arrests, and risk of witness tampering or evidence destruction, making the applicant unsuitable for bail despite his claims of being merely an employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Sushil Mahavirprasad Joshi, accused in a fraud case involving obtaining textile goods worth several crores without payment under sections 406, 409, 420, 120B, and 114 IPC. The court found the allegations grave and serious, noting prima facie evidence of systematic pre-planned fraudulent activity, ongoing investigation with pending arrests, and risk of witness tampering or evidence destruction, making the applicant unsuitable for bail despite his claims of being merely an employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts