MOHAMMED SAQIB MUNAF JARIWALA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - M K BRAHMBHATT — 1468/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010026662026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1469/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
1468/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
133
Police Station
ATHWALINES POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMED SAQIB MUNAF JARIWALA
Adv. E B HUSENI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - M K BRAHMBHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The 8th Additional Sessions Judge in Surat rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Mohammed Saqib Munaf Jariwala under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, finding a prima facie case of extortion against him. The court determined that the allegations—involving repeated demands for money totaling approximately Rs. 5,95,000 from a construction site owner over several years, with threats related to unlawful construction—constituted serious criminal conduct that warranted investigation without the protection of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The 8th Additional Sessions Judge in Surat rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Mohammed Saqib Munaf Jariwala under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, finding a prima facie case of extortion against him. The court determined that the allegations—involving repeated demands for money totaling approximately Rs. 5,95,000 from a construction site owner over several years, with threats related to unlawful construction—constituted serious criminal conduct that warranted investigation without the protection of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts