MOHAMMED SAQIB MUNAF JARIWALA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - M K BRAHMBHATT — 1468/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010026662026

Filing Number

1469/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

1468/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

3-8th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

133

Police Station

ATHWALINES POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 308(2),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED SAQIB MUNAF JARIWALA

    Adv. E B HUSENI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - M K BRAHMBHATT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    The 8th Additional Sessions Judge in Surat rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Mohammed Saqib Munaf Jariwala under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, finding a prima facie case of extortion against him. The court determined that the allegations—involving repeated demands for money totaling approximately Rs. 5,95,000 from a construction site owner over several years, with threats related to unlawful construction—constituted serious criminal conduct that warranted investigation without the protection of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    8th Addl District Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1468/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 8th Additional Sessions Judge in Surat rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Mohammed Saqib Munaf Jariwala under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, finding a prima facie case of extortion against him. The court determined that the allegations—involving repeated demands for money totaling approximately Rs. 5,95,000 from a construction site owner over several years, with threats related to unlawful construction—constituted serious criminal conduct that warranted investigation without the protection of anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case