MANGUKIYA MUKESHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - M K BRAHMBHATT — 1433/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010026152026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1434/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

1433/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

HAZIRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 303(2),316(2),317(4),287,288,61(2),54,3(5),316(3),

Petitioner(s)

MANGUKIYA MUKESHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI

Adv. R B LATHIYA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - M K BRAHMBHATT

Hearing History

Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

18-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

ORDER

09-03-2026

HEARING

05-03-2026

HEARING

28-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: The 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, rejected Mukeshbhai Shambhubhai Mangukiya's pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused—including his presence at the crime scene established through mobile call records and contact with co-accused—in connection with alleged chemical theft and careless disposal. The court held that anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy granted only in exceptional circumstances and that a prima facie case exists here; the fact that another co-accused received regular bail was insufficient to grant pre-arrest bail to the present applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, rejected Mukeshbhai Shambhubhai Mangukiya's pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused—including his presence at the crime scene established through mobile call records and contact with co-accused—in connection with alleged chemical theft and careless disposal. The court held that anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy granted only in exceptional circumstances and that a prima facie case exists here; the fact that another co-accused received regular bail was insufficient to grant pre-arrest bail to the present applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case