MANGUKIYA MUKESHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - M K BRAHMBHATT — 1433/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010026152026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1434/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
1433/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
HAZIRA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANGUKIYA MUKESHBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI
Adv. R B LATHIYA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - M K BRAHMBHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, rejected Mukeshbhai Shambhubhai Mangukiya's pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused—including his presence at the crime scene established through mobile call records and contact with co-accused—in connection with alleged chemical theft and careless disposal. The court held that anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy granted only in exceptional circumstances and that a prima facie case exists here; the fact that another co-accused received regular bail was insufficient to grant pre-arrest bail to the present applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, rejected Mukeshbhai Shambhubhai Mangukiya's pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused—including his presence at the crime scene established through mobile call records and contact with co-accused—in connection with alleged chemical theft and careless disposal. The court held that anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy granted only in exceptional circumstances and that a prima facie case exists here; the fact that another co-accused received regular bail was insufficient to grant pre-arrest bail to the present applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts