VIMLESH ALIAS BIMLESH INDAL ALIAS INDRA NISHAD vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA — 1427/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010025972026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1428/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
1427/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
VARACHHA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIMLESH ALIAS BIMLESH INDAL ALIAS INDRA NISHAD
Adv. M H CHAUDHARI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - R P DOBARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 27-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Vimlesh (age 23) filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found a prima facie case against the accused, who is charged with repeatedly raping a minor victim under the guise of employment, threatening her, making her pregnant, and causing injuries—offenses under the BNS and Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. The court determined that releasing the accused on bail posed risks of witness intimidation and flight from justice, as material witness evidence had not yet been recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Vimlesh (age 23) filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found a prima facie case against the accused, who is charged with repeatedly raping a minor victim under the guise of employment, threatening her, making her pregnant, and causing injuries—offenses under the BNS and Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act, 2012. The court determined that releasing the accused on bail posed risks of witness intimidation and flight from justice, as material witness evidence had not yet been recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts