NIRANJAN DHANU GAUDA vs Government of Gujarat — 1347/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010024812026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1348/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

1347/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11210045245560

Police Station

PANDESARA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 103(1),118(2),189(2)(4),190,191(2)(3),352,351(2)(3),
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135,

Petitioner(s)

NIRANJAN DHANU GAUDA

Adv. G G RETIWALA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

05-03-2026

HEARING

02-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Niranjan Dhanu Gauda, accused of assault causing death under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant inflicted head injuries on the deceased using a wooden stick, with medical evidence confirming death resulted from head injury complications. Considering the grave nature of the offense, the specific and distinct role attributed to the applicant, and sufficient incriminating material, the court exercised its discretion against granting bail in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Niranjan Dhanu Gauda, accused of assault causing death under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant inflicted head injuries on the deceased using a wooden stick, with medical evidence confirming death resulted from head injury complications. Considering the grave nature of the offense, the specific and distinct role attributed to the applicant, and sufficient incriminating material, the court exercised its discretion against granting bail in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case