NIRANJAN DHANU GAUDA vs Government of Gujarat — 1347/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010024812026
Filing Number
1348/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
1347/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
8-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11210045245560
Police Station
PANDESARA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIRANJAN DHANU GAUDA
Adv. G G RETIWALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Niranjan Dhanu Gauda, accused of assault causing death under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant inflicted head injuries on the deceased using a wooden stick, with medical evidence confirming death resulted from head injury complications. Considering the grave nature of the offense, the specific and distinct role attributed to the applicant, and sufficient incriminating material, the court exercised its discretion against granting bail in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1347/2026
The 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the bail application of Niranjan Dhanu Gauda, accused of assault causing death under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant inflicted head injuries on the deceased using a wooden stick, with medical evidence confirming death resulted from head injury complications. Considering the grave nature of the offense, the specific and distinct role attributed to the applicant, and sufficient incriminating material, the court exercised its discretion against granting bail in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts