NITESH UMESH THAKUR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI — 1287/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010024002026

Filing Number

1288/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

1287/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

7-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

219

Police Station

SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITESH UMESH THAKUR

    Adv. D C SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - T A PANCHOLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the bail application of Nitesh Umesh Thakur, accused under IPC Sections 61(i) and 81 for allegedly smuggling foreign liquor via train to unknown persons for financial gain. The court found the investigation was ongoing, interrogation of the accused was necessary, and risk of evidence tampering and absconding existed, making the prosecutor's opposition to bail justified under CrPC 2023 Section 482. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1287/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail application of Nitesh Umesh Thakur, accused under IPC Sections 61(i) and 81 for allegedly smuggling foreign liquor via train to unknown persons for financial gain. The court found the investigation was ongoing, interrogation of the accused was necessary, and risk of evidence tampering and absconding existed, making the prosecutor's opposition to bail justified under CrPC 2023 Section 482. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case