MOBH BHAVDIP DEVAKUBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU — 1234/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010023172026
Filing Number
1235/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
1234/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
306
Police Station
VARACHHA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOBH BHAVDIP DEVAKUBHAI
Adv. S M JIVANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the regular bail application of Mobh Bhavdip Devakubhai under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found prima facie allegations that the accused blackmailed and threatened the victim with non-consensual intimate videos/photos, made non-consensual physical contact, and found the offense serious in nature. Since the investigation was at a crucial stage, the court concluded that releasing the accused on bail could hinder fair investigation and thus denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Order
6th Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Reply Of I.O.
6th Addl District Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1234/2026
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the regular bail application of Mobh Bhavdip Devakubhai under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found prima facie allegations that the accused blackmailed and threatened the victim with non-consensual intimate videos/photos, made non-consensual physical contact, and found the offense serious in nature. Since the investigation was at a crucial stage, the court concluded that releasing the accused on bail could hinder fair investigation and thus denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts