MOBH BHAVDIP DEVAKUBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU — 1234/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010023172026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1235/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

1234/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

306

Police Station

VARACHHA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 64,64(2)(M),75(1)(1),308(5),54,

Petitioner(s)

MOBH BHAVDIP DEVAKUBHAI

Adv. S M JIVANI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

ORDER

25-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

21-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the regular bail application of Mobh Bhavdip Devakubhai under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found prima facie allegations that the accused blackmailed and threatened the victim with non-consensual intimate videos/photos, made non-consensual physical contact, and found the offense serious in nature. Since the investigation was at a crucial stage, the court concluded that releasing the accused on bail could hinder fair investigation and thus denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejected the regular bail application of Mobh Bhavdip Devakubhai under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found prima facie allegations that the accused blackmailed and threatened the victim with non-consensual intimate videos/photos, made non-consensual physical contact, and found the offense serious in nature. Since the investigation was at a crucial stage, the court concluded that releasing the accused on bail could hinder fair investigation and thus denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case