SAURABH NARENDRAKUMAR SHAH vs IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD — 133/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJSR010022992026

Case disposed

Filing Number

133/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

133/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

SAURABH NARENDRAKUMAR SHAH

Adv. S A SAVANI

Respondent(s)

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

Hearing History

Judge: 7-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

23-02-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partially granted Saurabh Narendrakumar Shah's application to withdraw fixed deposit funds from his motor accident compensation award. Shah had received ₹16,04,571 as compensation for injuries sustained in a motor accident on 16/5/19, with ₹17,64,806 placed in fixed deposit. The court approved withdrawal of 15% of the fixed deposit amount (₹2,64,721.90) to help cover his daughter's wedding expenses on 20/2/26, while directing the remaining balance to remain deposited until the prescribed period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partially granted Saurabh Narendrakumar Shah's application to withdraw fixed deposit funds from his motor accident compensation award. Shah had received ₹16,04,571 as compensation for injuries sustained in a motor accident on 16/5/19, with ₹17,64,806 placed in fixed deposit. The court approved withdrawal of 15% of the fixed deposit amount (₹2,64,721.90) to help cover his daughter's wedding expenses on 20/2/26, while directing the remaining balance to remain deposited until the prescribed period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case