HARSH VISHALKUMAR SHETH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU — 966/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010018622026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
967/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
966/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARSH VISHALKUMAR SHETH
Adv. K P RESHAMWALA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted regular bail to Harsh Vishalkumar Seth (age 29) in a case involving alleged offenses under BNS sections 137(2), 142 and POCSO Act section 12 involving minor victims. The court held that substantial investigation was complete, no further custodial interrogation was needed, and prolonged detention would constitute pretrial conviction. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹1,05,000 with matching surety, subject to conditions including residence restrictions, monthly police reporting, and avoidance of victim areas. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted regular bail to Harsh Vishalkumar Seth (age 29) in a case involving alleged offenses under BNS sections 137(2), 142 and POCSO Act section 12 involving minor victims. The court held that substantial investigation was complete, no further custodial interrogation was needed, and prolonged detention would constitute pretrial conviction. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹1,05,000 with matching surety, subject to conditions including residence restrictions, monthly police reporting, and avoidance of victim areas. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts