SOHEB ALIAS BABLU BISMILLA SAIYAD vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU — 777/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR010014782026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
778/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
777/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
LIMBAYAT POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SOHEB ALIAS BABLU BISMILLA SAIYAD
Adv. S D GHUGE
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - V L FALDU
Hearing History
Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted regular bail to the 23-year-old accused (Soheb @ Bablu) charged under BNS sections 74, 75(1)(i), 78(1)(i) and POCSO Act sections 7, 8, 11(4), 12 for allegedly harassing and threatening a minor girl. The court found that substantial investigation was complete, no further custodial interrogation was needed, and extended detention would constitute pretrial conviction. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including monthly police station reporting, residence restrictions, and staying away from the victim's area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat granted regular bail to the 23-year-old accused (Soheb @ Bablu) charged under BNS sections 74, 75(1)(i), 78(1)(i) and POCSO Act sections 7, 8, 11(4), 12 for allegedly harassing and threatening a minor girl. The court found that substantial investigation was complete, no further custodial interrogation was needed, and extended detention would constitute pretrial conviction. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including monthly police station reporting, residence restrictions, and staying away from the victim's area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts