VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI PROP OF SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAWALA KHANA vs GANESH RASAVALA KHAMAN LIVE ALOOPURI KHAVSA Advocate - C V CHHETA — 7/2025

Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 134,135. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.

Issues Next hearing 01-May-2026 this date has passed

COMM TMCS - COMMERCIAL TRADEMARK CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSR010013222025

Filing Number

7/2025

Filing Date

31-Jan-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

31-Jan-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

3-8th Addl District Judge

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 134,135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI PROP OF SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAWALA KHANA

    Adv. N K DEOKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANESH RASAVALA KHAMAN LIVE ALOOPURI KHAVSA Advocate - C V CHHETA

Case History

  1. 01-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Issues

    8th Addl District Judge

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Issues

    8th Addl District Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Commercial Court of Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case (TMSC No-7/2025). The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case regarding infringement of the registered trademark "SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI" and that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff. The defendants are restrained from using, selling, advertising, or dealing in the plaintiff's trademark or any deceptively similar mark until final disposal of the suit, with costs to be borne by the losing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Issues

    8th Addl District Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    8th Addl District Judge

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  14. 15-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  15. 23-Sep-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  16. 15-Sep-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  18. 08-Aug-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  19. 09-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  20. 19-Jun-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    9th Addl District Judge

  21. 04-Apr-2025

    Reply

    13th Addl District Judge

  22. 03-Apr-2025

    Reply

    13th Addl District Judge

  23. 18-Mar-2025

    Reply

    13th Addl District Judge

  24. 04-Mar-2025

    Reply

    13th Addl District Judge

  25. 24-Feb-2025

    Service Of Process

    13th Addl District Judge

  26. 12-Feb-2025

    Service Of Process

    13th Addl District Judge

  27. 03-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 31-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Commercial Court of Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case (TMSC No-7/2025). The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case regarding infringement of the registered trademark "SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI" and that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff. The defendants are restrained from using, selling, advertising, or dealing in the plaintiff's trademark or any deceptively similar mark until final disposal of the suit, with costs to be borne by the losing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case