VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI PROP OF SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAWALA KHANA vs GANESH RASAVALA KHAMAN LIVE ALOOPURI KHAVSA Advocate - C V CHHETA — 7/2025
Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 134,135,. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.
COMM TMCS - COMMERCIAL TRADEMARK CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR010013222025
Next Hearing
01st May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2025
Filing Date
31-01-2025
Registration No
7/2025
Registration Date
31-01-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI PROP OF SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAWALA KHANA
Adv. N K DEOKAR
Respondent(s)
GANESH RASAVALA KHAMAN LIVE ALOOPURI KHAVSA Advocate - C V CHHETA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
ISSUES
ISSUES
ISSUES
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 07-03-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 24-02-2026 | ISSUES | |
| 20-02-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION | |
| 31-01-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Commercial Court of Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case (TMSC No-7/2025). The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case regarding infringement of the registered trademark "SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI" and that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff. The defendants are restrained from using, selling, advertising, or dealing in the plaintiff's trademark or any deceptively similar mark until final disposal of the suit, with costs to be borne by the losing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Commercial Court of Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case (TMSC No-7/2025). The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case regarding infringement of the registered trademark "SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI" and that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff. The defendants are restrained from using, selling, advertising, or dealing in the plaintiff's trademark or any deceptively similar mark until final disposal of the suit, with costs to be borne by the losing party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts