VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI PROP OF SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAWALA KHANA vs GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI — 6/2025

Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 134,135,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

COMM TMCS - COMMERCIAL TRADEMARK CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSR010013212025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6/2025

Filing Date

31-01-2025

Registration No

6/2025

Registration Date

31-01-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 Section 134,135,

Petitioner(s)

VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI PROP OF SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAWALA KHANA

Adv. N K DEOKAR

Respondent(s)

GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

24-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

20-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

31-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

17-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

06-10-2025
ORDER

Summary: The Commercial Court in Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case against the defendants for infringement of the registered trademarks "Shree Ganesh Live Aloopuri" and "Shree Ganesh Live Aloopuri & Raswala Khaman," and that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss without such protection. The defendants are restrained from committing any infringement of these trademarks until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Commercial Court in Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case against the defendants for infringement of the registered trademarks "Shree Ganesh Live Aloopuri" and "Shree Ganesh Live Aloopuri & Raswala Khaman," and that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss without such protection. The defendants are restrained from committing any infringement of these trademarks until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case