VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI PROP OF SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAWALA KHANA vs GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI — 6/2025
Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 134,135,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
COMM TMCS - COMMERCIAL TRADEMARK CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSR010013212025
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6/2025
Filing Date
31-01-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
31-01-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VAGHASIYA KALPESHBHAI LALJIBHAI PROP OF SHREE GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI AND RASAWALA KHANA
Adv. N K DEOKAR
Respondent(s)
GANESH LIVE ALOOPURI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-8th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 24-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 20-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 31-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 17-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Commercial Court in Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case against the defendants for infringement of the registered trademarks "Shree Ganesh Live Aloopuri" and "Shree Ganesh Live Aloopuri & Raswala Khaman," and that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss without such protection. The defendants are restrained from committing any infringement of these trademarks until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Commercial Court in Surat granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case against the defendants for infringement of the registered trademarks "Shree Ganesh Live Aloopuri" and "Shree Ganesh Live Aloopuri & Raswala Khaman," and that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss without such protection. The defendants are restrained from committing any infringement of these trademarks until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts