MINESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE VALIBEN GANDABHAI DALPATBHAI vs RAMESHBHAI GANDABHAI PATEL — 31/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJSR010012952026

Filing Number

31/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MINESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE VALIBEN GANDABHAI DALPATBHAI

    Adv. A R PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI GANDABHAI PATEL

  2. 2.JAYMAN GANDABHAI PATEL

  3. 3.JAGJIVAN MADHAVBHAI PATEL

  4. 4.VIMALBHAI KHANDUBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: The Chief Judge of Surat District Court granted the petitioner's application to transfer two related civil cases (Regular Suit No. 156/2001 and Regular Suit No. 1270/2015) pending in separate courts to a single court to avoid conflicting judgments and ensure judicial efficiency. The court found that consolidating the cases—which involve common property disputes among the same parties—would prevent contradictory orders and serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chief Judge of Surat District Court granted the petitioner's application to transfer two related civil cases (Regular Suit No. 156/2001 and Regular Suit No. 1270/2015) pending in separate courts to a single court to avoid conflicting judgments and ensure judicial efficiency. The court found that consolidating the cases—which involve common property disputes among the same parties—would prevent contradictory orders and serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case