KANTABEN KISHORBHAI CHUDASMA vs RASIKBHAI NASVANBHAI CHAUDHARI — 10/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJSR010003242022

Filing Number

10/2022

Filing Date

07-Jan-2022

Registration No

10/2022

Registration Date

07-Jan-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANTABEN KISHORBHAI CHUDASMA

    Adv. B.N.DUNGARANI

  2. 2.KISHORBHAI ARJANBHAI CHUDASMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RASIKBHAI NASVANBHAI CHAUDHARI

  2. 2.GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

    Adv. D.V.DAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Surat decided two consolidated petitions arising from a fatal road accident on October 17, 2021, awarding compensation of Rs. 15,69,500 to each family. The tribunal found the State Transport Bus driver solely negligent for running over two motorcycle riders after they had fallen from their bike following a rickshaw's sudden braking, and held the Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation vicariously liable to pay compensation with 7.5% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Opponents Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 20-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 22-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

  13. 25-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    18th Addl District Judge

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    18th Addl District Judge

  15. 23-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    11th Addl District Judge

  16. 08-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    12th Addl District Judge

  17. 04-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    12th Addl District Judge

  18. 24-Feb-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    12th Addl District Judge

  19. 10-Jan-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    12th Addl District Judge

  20. 19-Dec-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    12th Addl District Judge

  21. 25-Oct-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    12th Addl District Judge

  22. 12-Aug-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    13th Addl District Judge

  23. 10-Jun-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    9th Addl District Judge

  24. 04-Mar-2024

    Applicants Evidence

    9th Addl District Judge

  25. 06-Dec-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    9th Addl District Judge

  26. 28-Jun-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    9th Addl District Judge

  27. 17-May-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  28. 01-Apr-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  29. 13-Feb-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  30. 05-Jan-2023

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  31. 03-Dec-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  32. 12-Oct-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  33. 23-Sep-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  34. 22-Aug-2022

    Order

  35. 22-Aug-2022

    Order

  36. 22-Aug-2022

    Applicants Evidence

    4th Addl District Judge

  37. 22-Jul-2022

    Order On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    4th Addl District Judge

  38. 13-Jul-2022

    Hearing On Interim Relief (No Fault Liability)

    4th Addl District Judge

  39. 17-Jun-2022

    Summons - Notice

    4th Addl District Judge

  40. 02-May-2022

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  41. 29-Mar-2022

    Summons - Notice

    6th Addl District Judge

  42. 14-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 07-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Surat decided two consolidated petitions arising from a fatal road accident on October 17, 2021, awarding compensation of Rs. 15,69,500 to each family. The tribunal found the State Transport Bus driver solely negligent for running over two motorcycle riders after they had fallen from their bike following a rickshaw's sudden braking, and held the Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation vicariously liable to pay compensation with 7.5% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case