Government of Gujarat vs HAKABHAI KANUBHAI PARGHI Advocate - R S SOLANKI — 929/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN170012792025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

929/2025

Filing Date

19-11-2025

Registration No

929/2025

Registration Date

19-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

BOMBAY PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HAKABHAI KANUBHAI PARGHI Advocate - R S SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-01-2026

PLEA

13-01-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted the accused Hakabhai Kanubhai Parghi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the contraband liquor (3 liters valued at Rs. 600) was recovered from the accused's direct possession on October 3, 2024. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchas (witnesses) who conducted the search could not corroborate the seizure details, no independent witnesses testified, and crucially, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report confirmed the seized material was actually alcohol. The lack of forensic evidence and weak witness testimonies meant the prosecution could not establish the charge with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted the accused Hakabhai Kanubhai Parghi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the contraband liquor (3 liters valued at Rs. 600) was recovered from the accused's direct possession on October 3, 2024. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: the panchas (witnesses) who conducted the search could not corroborate the seizure details, no independent witnesses testified, and crucially, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report confirmed the seized material was actually alcohol. The lack of forensic evidence and weak witness testimonies meant the prosecution could not establish the charge with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case