Government of Gujarat vs HAKABHAI KANUBHAI PARGHI Advocate - R S SOLANKI — 928/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN170012782025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

928/2025

Filing Date

19-11-2025

Registration No

928/2025

Registration Date

19-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

BOMBAY PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HAKABHAI KANUBHAI PARGHI Advocate - R S SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-01-2026

PLEA

13-01-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted the accused Hakabhai Kanubhai Pardhi of charges under the Alcohol Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 60. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the independent panch witnesses could not substantiate the actual seizure of liquor from the accused's possession, and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the nature of the seized material. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and granted bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted the accused Hakabhai Kanubhai Pardhi of charges under the Alcohol Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 60. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the independent panch witnesses could not substantiate the actual seizure of liquor from the accused's possession, and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the nature of the seized material. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and granted bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case