Government of Gujarat vs HAKABHAI KANUBHAI PARGHI Advocate - R S SOLANKI — 928/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN170012782025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
928/2025
Filing Date
19-11-2025
Registration No
928/2025
Registration Date
19-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-THANGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HAKABHAI KANUBHAI PARGHI Advocate - R S SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-01-2026 | PLEA | |
| 13-01-2026 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted the accused Hakabhai Kanubhai Pardhi of charges under the Alcohol Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 60. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the independent panch witnesses could not substantiate the actual seizure of liquor from the accused's possession, and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the nature of the seized material. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and granted bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted the accused Hakabhai Kanubhai Pardhi of charges under the Alcohol Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 60. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the independent panch witnesses could not substantiate the actual seizure of liquor from the accused's possession, and no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was produced to confirm the nature of the seized material. Consequently, the accused was acquitted and granted bail pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts