Government of Gujarat vs MUNABHAI DANABHAI PARGHI Advocate - J D CHAVDA — 927/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN170012772025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

927/2025

Filing Date

19-11-2025

Registration No

927/2025

Registration Date

19-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

BOMBAY PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MUNABHAI DANABHAI PARGHI Advocate - J D CHAVDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-01-2026

PLEA

13-01-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Thangadh Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Munabhai Danabhai Parghi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized alcohol was in his direct possession. The court noted that independent panchas (witnesses) could not corroborate the recovery details, no FSL report confirmed the substance was alcohol, and the prosecution's case relied solely on police testimony without sufficient independent evidence, warranting benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Thangadh Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Munabhai Danabhai Parghi of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized alcohol was in his direct possession. The court noted that independent panchas (witnesses) could not corroborate the recovery details, no FSL report confirmed the substance was alcohol, and the prosecution's case relied solely on police testimony without sufficient independent evidence, warranting benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case