Government of Gujarat vs KETAN URFE KALU RAMANBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - J M VAGHELA — 900/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116B,98(2),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN170012122025
Filing Number
900/2025
Filing Date
16-Oct-2025
Registration No
900/2025
Registration Date
16-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-THANGADH
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KETAN URFE KALU RAMANBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - J M VAGHELA
-
2.SAVANBHAI VINUBHAI VANAPARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Judegement
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted both accused under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that foreign liquor seized from their possession was genuine. The court held that witness testimony from the panchas (independent witnesses) did not corroborate the seizure, no FSL report was produced to authenticate the bottles, and no company representative verified the product's authenticity—therefore the presumption under Section 116(B) could not be invoked. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 900/2025
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted both accused under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that foreign liquor seized from their possession was genuine. The court held that witness testimony from the panchas (independent witnesses) did not corroborate the seizure, no FSL report was produced to authenticate the bottles, and no company representative verified the product's authenticity—therefore the presumption under Section 116(B) could not be invoked. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts