Government of Gujarat vs VISVAJITBHAI URFE VICCHU BHARATBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V M DANA — 714/2025
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116B,81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN170009632025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
714/2025
Filing Date
11-08-2025
Registration No
714/2025
Registration Date
11-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-THANGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. V M DANA
Respondent(s)
VISVAJITBHAI URFE VICCHU BHARATBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V M DANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Thangadh Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Vishwajitbhai (alias Vichhu) of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 64E, 116(B), 81, and 98(2). The court found that while police recovered foreign liquor bottles and a vehicle from the accused, the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the seizure details and no FSL report or manufacturer authentication was provided to confirm the liquor's authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Thangadh Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Vishwajitbhai (alias Vichhu) of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 64E, 116(B), 81, and 98(2). The court found that while police recovered foreign liquor bottles and a vehicle from the accused, the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the seizure details and no FSL report or manufacturer authentication was provided to confirm the liquor's authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts