Government of Gujarat vs VISVAJITBHAI URFE VICCHU BHARATBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V M DANA — 714/2025

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116B,81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN170009632025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

714/2025

Filing Date

11-08-2025

Registration No

714/2025

Registration Date

11-08-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

BOMBAY PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116B,81,98(2)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. V M DANA

Respondent(s)

VISVAJITBHAI URFE VICCHU BHARATBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V M DANA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

12-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

17-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Thangadh Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Vishwajitbhai (alias Vichhu) of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 64E, 116(B), 81, and 98(2). The court found that while police recovered foreign liquor bottles and a vehicle from the accused, the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the seizure details and no FSL report or manufacturer authentication was provided to confirm the liquor's authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Thangadh Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Vishwajitbhai (alias Vichhu) of charges under the Prohibition Act sections 64E, 116(B), 81, and 98(2). The court found that while police recovered foreign liquor bottles and a vehicle from the accused, the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the seizure details and no FSL report or manufacturer authentication was provided to confirm the liquor's authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case