Government of Gujarat vs JAYDIPBHAI RAMESHBHAI KIHALA Advocate - J D CHAVDA — 680/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(1),352,351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN170009222025
Filing Number
680/2025
Filing Date
04-Aug-2025
Registration No
680/2025
Registration Date
04-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-THANGADH
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11211050250305
Police Station
THANGADH POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYDIPBHAI RAMESHBHAI KIHALA Advocate - J D CHAVDA
-
2.RAMESHBHAI GANGARAMBHAI GADHADARA
Adv. J D CHAVDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 680/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted both accused persons (Jaydipbhai Rameshbhai Kihala and Rameshbhai Gangarambhai Gadhadara) of charges under BNS Sections 115(1), 352, 351(2), 54, and GP Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant's witnesses testified about injuries and an altercation, they failed to establish that the accused intentionally used weapons or inflicted injuries with criminal intent. The court noted that mere injuries from pushing/jostling during a crowd incident, without proof of deliberate weapon use or threats with specific intent to alarm, do not constitute the alleged offenses. The prosecution's documentary evidence, including medical certificates and panchayat records, was insufficient to corroborate the formal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 680/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 680/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted both accused persons (Jaydipbhai Rameshbhai Kihala and Rameshbhai Gangarambhai Gadhadara) of charges under BNS Sections 115(1), 352, 351(2), 54, and GP Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant's witnesses testified about injuries and an altercation, they failed to establish that the accused intentionally used weapons or inflicted injuries with criminal intent. The court noted that mere injuries from pushing/jostling during a crowd incident, without proof of deliberate weapon use or threats with specific intent to alarm, do not constitute the alleged offenses. The prosecution's documentary evidence, including medical certificates and panchayat records, was insufficient to corroborate the formal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts