Government of Gujarat vs JAYDIPBHAI RAMESHBHAI KIHALA Advocate - J D CHAVDA — 680/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(1),352,351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN170009222025

Filing Number

680/2025

Filing Date

04-Aug-2025

Registration No

680/2025

Registration Date

04-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11211050250305

Police Station

THANGADH POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(1),352,351(2),54
Bombay Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYDIPBHAI RAMESHBHAI KIHALA Advocate - J D CHAVDA

  2. 2.RAMESHBHAI GANGARAMBHAI GADHADARA

    Adv. J D CHAVDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 680/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted both accused persons (Jaydipbhai Rameshbhai Kihala and Rameshbhai Gangarambhai Gadhadara) of charges under BNS Sections 115(1), 352, 351(2), 54, and GP Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant's witnesses testified about injuries and an altercation, they failed to establish that the accused intentionally used weapons or inflicted injuries with criminal intent. The court noted that mere injuries from pushing/jostling during a crowd incident, without proof of deliberate weapon use or threats with specific intent to alarm, do not constitute the alleged offenses. The prosecution's documentary evidence, including medical certificates and panchayat records, was insufficient to corroborate the formal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 10-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 04-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 680/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 680/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thangadh acquitted both accused persons (Jaydipbhai Rameshbhai Kihala and Rameshbhai Gangarambhai Gadhadara) of charges under BNS Sections 115(1), 352, 351(2), 54, and GP Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant's witnesses testified about injuries and an altercation, they failed to establish that the accused intentionally used weapons or inflicted injuries with criminal intent. The court noted that mere injuries from pushing/jostling during a crowd incident, without proof of deliberate weapon use or threats with specific intent to alarm, do not constitute the alleged offenses. The prosecution's documentary evidence, including medical certificates and panchayat records, was insufficient to corroborate the formal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case