Government of Gujarat vs VISHVJIT URFE VISHUBHAI BHARATBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V M DANA — 313/2024

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN170005492024

Filing Number

313/2024

Filing Date

23-Jul-2024

Registration No

313/2024

Registration Date

23-Jul-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT-THANGADH

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E),116(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHVJIT URFE VISHUBHAI BHARATBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - V M DANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Thangadh acquitted the accused Vishwajit (Vishu Bhai) under the Prohibition Act sections 60(A)(I) and 116(B), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the testimony of the panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the alleged recovery of foreign liquor bottles, no independent evidence confirmed the bottles' authenticity, and critical procedural requirements were not met, warranting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 22-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 18-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 27-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 02-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 15-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 24-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 08-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 11-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 18-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 04-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 28-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 07-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 30-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 18-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 27-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 13-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 16-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 05-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 21-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 31-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 23-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 23-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 313/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Thangadh acquitted the accused Vishwajit (Vishu Bhai) under the Prohibition Act sections 60(A)(I) and 116(B), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the testimony of the panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the alleged recovery of foreign liquor bottles, no independent evidence confirmed the bottles' authenticity, and critical procedural requirements were not met, warranting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case