Government of Gujarat vs Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya Advocate - G K GABU — 16/2024
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd April 2026.
ELEC - SPECIAL CASE - ELECTRICITY
CNR: GJSN160004892024
Filing Number
16/2024
Filing Date
18-Jun-2024
Registration No
16/2024
Registration Date
18-Jun-2024
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Limbdi
Judge
26-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
5332
Police Station
SURENDRANAGAR CITY POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya Advocate - G K GABU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary Case 16/2024: Government of Gujarat v. Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya Advocate The Special Electricity Court in Limbdi acquitted defendant Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya of electricity theft charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally bypassed an electrical meter and stole 43.436 kilowatts of power valued at ₹41,28,840.40. Key evidentiary gaps included: lack of independent witnesses, contradictions in witness statements, no seizure memo for allegedly confiscated materials, and absence of photographic documentation of the alleged theft site. The court found the prosecution's case rested entirely on testimony from power company officials with vested interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Further Statement
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-Nov-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Oct-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Documentary Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Documentary Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Documentary Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Documentary Evidence
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Documentary Evidence
Addl. District Judge
-
12-Feb-2025
For Vakalatnama
Addl. District Judge
-
27-Dec-2024
For Vakalatnama
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
For Vakalatnama
Addl. District Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
For Vakalatnama
2nd Addl District Judge
-
01-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2024
Summary Case 16/2024: Government of Gujarat v. Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya Advocate The Special Electricity Court in Limbdi acquitted defendant Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya of electricity theft charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally bypassed an electrical meter and stole 43.436 kilowatts of power valued at ₹41,28,840.40. Key evidentiary gaps included: lack of independent witnesses, contradictions in witness statements, no seizure memo for allegedly confiscated materials, and absence of photographic documentation of the alleged theft site. The court found the prosecution's case rested entirely on testimony from power company officials with vested interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts