Government of Gujarat vs Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya Advocate - G K GABU — 16/2024

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

ELEC - SPECIAL CASE - ELECTRICITY

CNR: GJSN160004892024

Filing Number

16/2024

Filing Date

18-Jun-2024

Registration No

16/2024

Registration Date

18-Jun-2024

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Limbdi

Judge

26-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5332

Police Station

SURENDRANAGAR CITY POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. AGP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya Advocate - G K GABU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary Case 16/2024: Government of Gujarat v. Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya Advocate The Special Electricity Court in Limbdi acquitted defendant Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya of electricity theft charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally bypassed an electrical meter and stole 43.436 kilowatts of power valued at ₹41,28,840.40. Key evidentiary gaps included: lack of independent witnesses, contradictions in witness statements, no seizure memo for allegedly confiscated materials, and absence of photographic documentation of the alleged theft site. The court found the prosecution's case rested entirely on testimony from power company officials with vested interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  13. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  15. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  17. 07-Nov-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    2nd Addl District Judge

  18. 18-Oct-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    2nd Addl District Judge

  19. 03-Oct-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    2nd Addl District Judge

  20. 04-Sep-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    2nd Addl District Judge

  21. 13-Aug-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    2nd Addl District Judge

  22. 07-Aug-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  23. 21-Jul-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  24. 16-Jun-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  25. 06-Jun-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    2nd Addl District Judge

  26. 24-Apr-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  27. 12-Feb-2025

    For Vakalatnama

    Addl. District Judge

  28. 27-Dec-2024

    For Vakalatnama

    Addl. District Judge

  29. 07-Nov-2024

    For Vakalatnama

    Addl. District Judge

  30. 12-Sep-2024

    For Vakalatnama

    2nd Addl District Judge

  31. 01-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl District Judge

  32. 26-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 18-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case 16/2024: Government of Gujarat v. Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya Advocate The Special Electricity Court in Limbdi acquitted defendant Kishorbhai Premjibhai Sarvaiya of electricity theft charges under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally bypassed an electrical meter and stole 43.436 kilowatts of power valued at ₹41,28,840.40. Key evidentiary gaps included: lack of independent witnesses, contradictions in witness statements, no seizure memo for allegedly confiscated materials, and absence of photographic documentation of the alleged theft site. The court found the prosecution's case rested entirely on testimony from power company officials with vested interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case