Maheshbhai Baldevbhai Hadaniya vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 69/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1),125(a),125(b),324(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLN - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN160002342026

Filing Number

69/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

69/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Limbdi

Judge

24-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

CHUDA POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT

Year

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1),125(a),125(b),324(4)

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,134-b

Petitioner(s)

1.Maheshbhai Baldevbhai Hadaniya

Adv. S D SANGHARIYAT

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
17-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

The Additional District Judge at Limbdi allowed Maheshbhai Baldevbhai Hadaniya's application to condone an 80-day delay in filing an appeal against a lower court's judgment from November 2025, citing his lack of legal knowledge and procedural unfamiliarity. The court adopted a liberal approach consistent with Gujarat High Court precedent, prioritizing substantial justice over technical strictness, and directed the registry to register the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
17-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addl. District Judge
16-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge at Limbdi allowed Maheshbhai Baldevbhai Hadaniya's application to condone an 80-day delay in filing an appeal against a lower court's judgment from November 2025, citing his lack of legal knowledge and procedural unfamiliarity. The court adopted a liberal approach consistent with Gujarat High Court precedent, prioritizing substantial justice over technical strictness, and directed the registry to register the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.