Khodabhai Raghavbhai Makwana vs Government of Gujarat — 59/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLN - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN160001302026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

59/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

59/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Limbdi

Judge

24-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482,

Petitioner(s)

Khodabhai Raghavbhai Makwana

Adv. D B GOSWAMI

Anilbhai Khodabhai Makwana

Adv. D B GOSWAMI

Madhuben Khodabhai Makwana

Adv. D B GOSWAMI

Prafulbhai Khodabhai Makwana

Adv. D B GOSWAMI

Komalben Prafulbhai Makwana

Adv. D B GOSWAMI

Bhailalbhai

Adv. D B GOSWAMI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 24-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDER

28-02-2026

AFFIDAVIT IN REPLY

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Limbdi rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by six accused persons under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.). The accused sought bail in connection with charges under Sections 351(1), 85, 54, 89 of B.N.S. read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, involving serious allegations of forced abortion of a 2.5-month fetus. The court found that granting bail was not in the interest of justice given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation, and risk of compromising fair investigation, and therefore rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Limbdi rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by six accused persons under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.). The accused sought bail in connection with charges under Sections 351(1), 85, 54, 89 of B.N.S. read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, involving serious allegations of forced abortion of a 2.5-month fetus. The court found that granting bail was not in the interest of justice given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation, and risk of compromising fair investigation, and therefore rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Limbdi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case