Khodabhai Raghavbhai Makwana vs Government of Gujarat — 59/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLN - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSN160001302026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
59/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Limbdi
Judge
24-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Khodabhai Raghavbhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
Anilbhai Khodabhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
Madhuben Khodabhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
Prafulbhai Khodabhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
Komalben Prafulbhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
Bhailalbhai
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
Hearing History
Judge: 24-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
AFFIDAVIT IN REPLY
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 28-02-2026 | AFFIDAVIT IN REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Limbdi rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by six accused persons under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.). The accused sought bail in connection with charges under Sections 351(1), 85, 54, 89 of B.N.S. read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, involving serious allegations of forced abortion of a 2.5-month fetus. The court found that granting bail was not in the interest of justice given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation, and risk of compromising fair investigation, and therefore rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Limbdi rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by six accused persons under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.). The accused sought bail in connection with charges under Sections 351(1), 85, 54, 89 of B.N.S. read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, involving serious allegations of forced abortion of a 2.5-month fetus. The court found that granting bail was not in the interest of justice given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation, and risk of compromising fair investigation, and therefore rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts