Khodabhai Raghavbhai Makwana vs Government of Gujarat — 59/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLN - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSN160001302026
Filing Number
59/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Limbdi
Judge
24-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Khodabhai Raghavbhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
-
2.Anilbhai Khodabhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
-
3.Madhuben Khodabhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
-
4.Prafulbhai Khodabhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
-
5.Komalben Prafulbhai Makwana
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
-
6.Bhailalbhai
Adv. D B GOSWAMI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Limbdi rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by six accused persons under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.). The accused sought bail in connection with charges under Sections 351(1), 85, 54, 89 of B.N.S. read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, involving serious allegations of forced abortion of a 2.5-month fetus. The court found that granting bail was not in the interest of justice given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation, and risk of compromising fair investigation, and therefore rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
Addl. District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 59/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Limbdi rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by six accused persons under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.). The accused sought bail in connection with charges under Sections 351(1), 85, 54, 89 of B.N.S. read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, involving serious allegations of forced abortion of a 2.5-month fetus. The court found that granting bail was not in the interest of justice given the gravity of the offense, ongoing investigation, and risk of compromising fair investigation, and therefore rejected the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts