GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RASULBHAI NATHUBHAI LATHVALI Advocate - N D SOLANKI — 23/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,333,353,224,504,506(2),114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJSN150006142021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
23/2021
Filing Date
29-10-2021
Registration No
23/2021
Registration Date
29-10-2021
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Dhrangadhra
Judge
14-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
RASULBHAI NATHUBHAI LATHVALI Advocate - N D SOLANKI
SHARIFBHAI ALLARAKHABHAI LATHVANI
Adv. N D SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 14-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Third Additional Sessions Judge of Dhandhuka acquitted two accused persons (Rasulbhai Nthubhai Lathwani and Sharifbhai Allarkkha Lathwani) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 307, 333, 353, 504, 506(2), 224, 114, Arms Act Section 25(1)(1-B), and GPS Act Section 137. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had attacked a police officer with a knife or possessed illegal weapons, as crucial evidence linking the accused to these specific criminal acts was insufficient and contradictory witness statements undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Third Additional Sessions Judge of Dhandhuka acquitted two accused persons (Rasulbhai Nthubhai Lathwani and Sharifbhai Allarkkha Lathwani) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 307, 333, 353, 504, 506(2), 224, 114, Arms Act Section 25(1)(1-B), and GPS Act Section 137. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had attacked a police officer with a knife or possessed illegal weapons, as crucial evidence linking the accused to these specific criminal acts was insufficient and contradictory witness statements undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts