GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MAYURDHWAJSINH URFE LALBHA MERUBHA ZALA Advocate - M V UPADHYAY — 17/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,323,324,504,506(2),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJSN150005872025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
05-07-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
05-07-2025
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Dhrangadhra
Judge
14-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
MAYURDHWAJSINH URFE LALBHA MERUBHA ZALA Advocate - M V UPADHYAY
Hearing History
Judge: 14-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court (Third Additional Sessions Judge) acquitted the accused Mayurdhvajsinh (alias Lalabha Merubha Jhala) and other co-accused in a murder case registered at Dhandhuka City Police Station (FIR No. 41/2013) under IPC sections 302, 323, 324, 504, 506(2), and Arms Act section 25(1-A), 27, and 135. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence from witnesses and investigation officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court (Third Additional Sessions Judge) acquitted the accused Mayurdhvajsinh (alias Lalabha Merubha Jhala) and other co-accused in a murder case registered at Dhandhuka City Police Station (FIR No. 41/2013) under IPC sections 302, 323, 324, 504, 506(2), and Arms Act section 25(1-A), 27, and 135. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against the accused beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence from witnesses and investigation officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts