SANJAY URFE CHHANO UKABHAI CHAUHAN vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 65/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CR MISC. A - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSN150002182026
Filing Number
65/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
65/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Dhrangadhra
Judge
14-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
DHRANGADHRA TALUKA POLICE STATION - SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY URFE CHHANO UKABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. P V KORADIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
-
2.RAVATBHAI VIRJIBHAI SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Cri.Misc.Appli.No.65/2026 Court Decision: The 3rd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Dhrangadhra rejected the bail application of Sanjay @ Channo Ukabhai Chauhan on 17 March 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found a prima facie case against the accused, who allegedly lured a 15-year-old minor girl with false promises of marriage, kidnapped her from lawful guardianship, and sexually assaulted her under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(I)(M) and POCSO Act Sections 3(A), 4, 5(L), 6, 12, 18. Given the gravity of the offense and women's safety concerns, the court held that filing a chargesheet does not constitute a change in circumstances warranting bail, and the accused should pursue discharge proceedings instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2026
Case Summary: Cri.Misc.Appli.No.65/2026 Court Decision: The 3rd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Dhrangadhra rejected the bail application of Sanjay @ Channo Ukabhai Chauhan on 17 March 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found a prima facie case against the accused, who allegedly lured a 15-year-old minor girl with false promises of marriage, kidnapped her from lawful guardianship, and sexually assaulted her under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(I)(M) and POCSO Act Sections 3(A), 4, 5(L), 6, 12, 18. Given the gravity of the offense and women's safety concerns, the court held that filing a chargesheet does not constitute a change in circumstances warranting bail, and the accused should pursue discharge proceedings instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts