VIJAYBHAI SURESHBHAI VAGHELA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 56/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CR MISC. A - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSN150001082026

Filing Number

56/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

56/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Dhrangadhra

Judge

14-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI SURESHBHAI VAGHELA

    Adv. U I MAKWANA

  2. 2.ASWINBHAI LALABHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. U I MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court partially allowed the bail application. Vijaybhai Sureshbhai Vaghela was granted bail with a surety of Rs. 25,000 and personal bond of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and no contact with the complainant. However, Ashwinbhai Lalabhai Solanki's bail was rejected, as the court found sufficient evidence of serious offences including robbery, assault with weapons, and witness intimidation, with investigation still ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 56/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the bail application. Vijaybhai Sureshbhai Vaghela was granted bail with a surety of Rs. 25,000 and personal bond of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and no contact with the complainant. However, Ashwinbhai Lalabhai Solanki's bail was rejected, as the court found sufficient evidence of serious offences including robbery, assault with weapons, and witness intimidation, with investigation still ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case