GOVT. OF GUJARAT vs Dipakbhai Gafurbhai Khakhrodiya Advocate - D K VAGHELA — 98/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN140001412026
Filing Number
98/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
98/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, WADHWAN
Judge
26-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVT. OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dipakbhai Gafurbhai Khakhrodiya Advocate - D K VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(b), finding insufficient evidence that the accused possessed or sold illicit liquor without proper authorization. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting the absence of witness statements, incomplete investigation details, and lack of proper documentary evidence required to prove the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2026
Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(b), finding insufficient evidence that the accused possessed or sold illicit liquor without proper authorization. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting the absence of witness statements, incomplete investigation details, and lack of proper documentary evidence required to prove the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts