GOVT. OF GUJARAT vs Dipakbhai Gafurbhai Khakhrodiya Advocate - D K VAGHELA — 98/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSN140001412026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

98/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, WADHWAN

Judge

26-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVT. OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dipakbhai Gafurbhai Khakhrodiya Advocate - D K VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(b), finding insufficient evidence that the accused possessed or sold illicit liquor without proper authorization. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting the absence of witness statements, incomplete investigation details, and lack of proper documentary evidence required to prove the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(b), finding insufficient evidence that the accused possessed or sold illicit liquor without proper authorization. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting the absence of witness statements, incomplete investigation details, and lack of proper documentary evidence required to prove the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case