STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUNILSINGH RAJPUT — 22/2024

Case under The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 26D,26(2),26(B)1. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJSN130001722024

Filing Number

22/2024

Filing Date

19-Oct-2024

Registration No

22/2024

Registration Date

19-Oct-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, SURENDRANAGAR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 26D,26(2),26(B)1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNILSINGH RAJPUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Labour Court in Surendranagar took cognizance of offences against respondent Sunilsingh Rajput under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and 1961 for alleged violations of minimum wage provisions. Despite being served notice under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the respondent failed to appear or respond, and was consequently proceeded against ex-parte. The court ordered initiation of a criminal case and directed issuance of summons to the respondent along with a copy of the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 26-Dec-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 11-Nov-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 27-Oct-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 06-Oct-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 25-Aug-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 12-Jun-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 17-May-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 19-Apr-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 28-Mar-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 15-Mar-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 01-Mar-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 15-Feb-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 28-Jan-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 04-Jan-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 12-Dec-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 09-Dec-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 26-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 19-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Labour Court in Surendranagar took cognizance of offences against respondent Sunilsingh Rajput under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and 1961 for alleged violations of minimum wage provisions. Despite being served notice under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the respondent failed to appear or respond, and was consequently proceeded against ex-parte. The court ordered initiation of a criminal case and directed issuance of summons to the respondent along with a copy of the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case