P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI vs ASHOKBHAI SAVJIBHAI DEVIPUJAK — 563/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN120031602025

Filing Number

563/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

563/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PATDI

Judge

31-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI

    Adv. D M CHAVDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKBHAI SAVJIBHAI DEVIPUJAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 563/2025 The Principal Civil Judge at Surendranagar dismissed the electricity company's claim against the defendant for Rs. 123,502.51 in alleged electricity theft charges. The court found that while the company alleged the defendant unlawfully tapped into power lines on January 30, 2025, the company failed to establish its case because it had not obtained a prior civil liability determination from the Special Court under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, as required by law before pursuing civil recovery in a civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 563/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 563/2025 The Principal Civil Judge at Surendranagar dismissed the electricity company's claim against the defendant for Rs. 123,502.51 in alleged electricity theft charges. The court found that while the company alleged the defendant unlawfully tapped into power lines on January 30, 2025, the company failed to establish its case because it had not obtained a prior civil liability determination from the Special Court under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, as required by law before pursuing civil recovery in a civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case