P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI vs KANTIBHAI SAVJIBHAI DEVIPUJAK — 561/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN120031582025

Filing Number

561/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

561/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PATDI

Judge

31-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI

    Adv. D M CHAVDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANTIBHAI SAVJIBHAI DEVIPUJAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 561/2025 Court Decision: The court rejected the P.G.V.C.L. Sub Division Patadi's claim for Rs. 116,185.63 against Kantibhai Savjibhai Devipujak for alleged electricity theft. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the burden of establishing unauthorized electricity usage because the case lacked evidence of a criminal determination by the special court under the Electricity Act's Section 135, which is a prerequisite for civil liability in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 561/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 561/2025 Court Decision: The court rejected the P.G.V.C.L. Sub Division Patadi's claim for Rs. 116,185.63 against Kantibhai Savjibhai Devipujak for alleged electricity theft. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the burden of establishing unauthorized electricity usage because the case lacked evidence of a criminal determination by the special court under the Electricity Act's Section 135, which is a prerequisite for civil liability in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case