P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI vs BATUKBHAI HIRABHAI BHARAVAD — 556/2025
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSN120031532025
Filing Number
556/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
556/2025
Registration Date
17-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PATDI
Judge
31-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI
Adv. D M CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BATUKBHAI HIRABHAI BHARAVAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 556/2025 The court dismissed P.G.V.C.L. Sub Division Patadi's claim for Rs. 59,335.63 against Batukbhai Hirabhai Bharvad for electricity theft. Though authorities allegedly detected unauthorized electricity use for irrigation on the defendant's land on 22/01/2025 and filed a police complaint, the plaintiff failed to establish its case, as no evidence demonstrated that the special court had concluded the criminal proceedings or determined civil liability as required under the Electricity Act's Section 135. The court held that without a prior criminal determination by the special court, the civil recovery suit was premature and unsupported by sufficient proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2026
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 556/2025
Case Summary: RCS 556/2025 The court dismissed P.G.V.C.L. Sub Division Patadi's claim for Rs. 59,335.63 against Batukbhai Hirabhai Bharvad for electricity theft. Though authorities allegedly detected unauthorized electricity use for irrigation on the defendant's land on 22/01/2025 and filed a police complaint, the plaintiff failed to establish its case, as no evidence demonstrated that the special court had concluded the criminal proceedings or determined civil liability as required under the Electricity Act's Section 135. The court held that without a prior criminal determination by the special court, the civil recovery suit was premature and unsupported by sufficient proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts