P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI vs SURESHKUMAR RAMCHANDRA VAISHNAV Advocate - I K MALEK — 397/2023

JudegementView PDF

The court rejected the electricity company's civil suit seeking recovery of electricity theft charges under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, holding that such disputes fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Special Court, not civil courts. The court found that civil liability for electricity theft must be determined by the Special Court through criminal proceedings under Section 154(5) of the Act, making the plaintiff's suit lacking in cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plaintiff Evidence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Issues

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Reply

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Reply

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 397/2023