P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI vs RAMESHBHAI @ RAMESHCHANDRA PRANJIBHAI PATEL Advocate - I K MALEK — 327/2023
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 30th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSN120018592023
Filing Number
327/2023
Filing Date
25-Aug-2023
Registration No
327/2023
Registration Date
25-Aug-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, PATDI
Judge
31-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI
Adv. H H NANDANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESHBHAI @ RAMESHCHANDRA PRANJIBHAI PATEL Advocate - I K MALEK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 327/2023 The court rejected the electricity company's civil suit against the respondent for electricity theft recovery under Electricity Act Section 135. The court held that civil liability for electricity theft must be determined exclusively by the Special Court under Section 154(5) of the Act, not by regular civil courts, and that the company failed to establish a valid cause of action by not first obtaining a criminal conviction or civil liability determination from the Special Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2024
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2024
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2024
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2024
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2023
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2023
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 327/2023
Summary of Case 327/2023 The court rejected the electricity company's civil suit against the respondent for electricity theft recovery under Electricity Act Section 135. The court held that civil liability for electricity theft must be determined exclusively by the Special Court under Section 154(5) of the Act, not by regular civil courts, and that the company failed to establish a valid cause of action by not first obtaining a criminal conviction or civil liability determination from the Special Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts