P.G.V.C.L SUB DIVISION.DASADA vs MUKESHBHAI NAVAGHANBHAI THAKOR — 13/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN120000312026

Filing Number

13/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PATDI

Judge

31-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L SUB DIVISION.DASADA

    Adv. B B MALEK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI NAVAGHANBHAI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: RCS 13/2026 The Principal Civil Judge at Surendranagar dismissed P.G.V.C.L's claim for Rs. 6,883.30 against Mukeshbhai Navaghanbhai Thakor for alleged electricity theft. The court found that the plaintiff failed to discharge its burden of proof regarding the electricity theft and the defendant's civil liability, noting that without prior criminal court findings under the Electricity Act Section 135, a civil damages claim cannot proceed independently in this jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 13/2026 The Principal Civil Judge at Surendranagar dismissed P.G.V.C.L's claim for Rs. 6,883.30 against Mukeshbhai Navaghanbhai Thakor for alleged electricity theft. The court found that the plaintiff failed to discharge its burden of proof regarding the electricity theft and the defendant's civil liability, noting that without prior criminal court findings under the Electricity Act Section 135, a civil damages claim cannot proceed independently in this jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case