HARPALSINH JAGABHAI GOHIL vs HITESHBHAI NATHABHAI MAKVANA — 19/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 16th May 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJSN110008682025
Filing Number
19/2025
Filing Date
18-Nov-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
18-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, CHUDA
Judge
35-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARPALSINH JAGABHAI GOHIL
Adv. M A MIRZA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HITESHBHAI NATHABHAI MAKVANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
Order
The court dismissed the criminal inquiry against the accused (Hiteshbhai Nathabhai Makvana) due to the complainant's failure to file a new statement for over three months and the accused's continuous absence, which prevented the case from proceeding. The court found that since the complainant did not present a new statement as required and proper notice could not be served on the accused, there were sufficient grounds to dismiss the case under justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Apr-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2025
The court dismissed the criminal inquiry against the accused (Hiteshbhai Nathabhai Makvana) due to the complainant's failure to file a new statement for over three months and the accused's continuous absence, which prevented the case from proceeding. The court found that since the complainant did not present a new statement as required and proper notice could not be served on the accused, there were sufficient grounds to dismiss the case under justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts