P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs MERABHAI KAMABHAI RABARI — 125/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJSN080023912024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

125/2024

Filing Date

30-07-2024

Registration No

125/2024

Registration Date

30-07-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA

Judge

16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 21,

Petitioner(s)

P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra

Adv. H K VYAS

Respondent(s)

MERABHAI KAMABHAI RABARI

Hearing History

Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

10-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

19-01-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

16-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
ORDER

The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders mandating disposal of these petitions within six months from filing, with presiding officers being answerable to the High Court on the administrative side if deadlines are not met. The court reiterated the mandatory six-month disposal timeline established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and required High Courts to forward consolidated reports to the Supreme Court Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders mandating disposal of these petitions within six months from filing, with presiding officers being answerable to the High Court on the administrative side if deadlines are not met. The court reiterated the mandatory six-month disposal timeline established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and required High Courts to forward consolidated reports to the Supreme Court Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case