P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs FAKIR IKBALSHA AKBARSHA — 687/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 20,7. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSN080023342025
Filing Number
687/2025
Filing Date
26-Jun-2025
Registration No
687/2025
Registration Date
26-Jun-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA
Judge
16-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra
Adv. G K RAVAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.FAKIR IKBALSHA AKBARSHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
Summary: P.G.V.C.L. Dharangadhra v. Fakir Ikbalsha Akbarsha (RCS 687/2025) Court Decision: The court rejected the power company's civil suit seeking recovery of unpaid electricity bills from the respondent for alleged electricity theft under Section 154(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that under the Electricity Act's statutory framework, civil liability for electricity theft can only be determined by the Special Court as part of criminal proceedings under Section 135, not through separate civil suits. The plaint was dismissed for lacking a valid cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Sep-2025
Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Sep-2025
Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 687/2025
Summary: P.G.V.C.L. Dharangadhra v. Fakir Ikbalsha Akbarsha (RCS 687/2025) Court Decision: The court rejected the power company's civil suit seeking recovery of unpaid electricity bills from the respondent for alleged electricity theft under Section 154(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that under the Electricity Act's statutory framework, civil liability for electricity theft can only be determined by the Special Court as part of criminal proceedings under Section 135, not through separate civil suits. The plaint was dismissed for lacking a valid cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts