P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs ZALA NAVUBHA FULUBHA — 670/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 06th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSN080022312025
Filing Number
670/2025
Filing Date
23-Jun-2025
Registration No
670/2025
Registration Date
23-Jun-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA
Judge
15-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra
Adv. B J DWIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.ZALA NAVUBHA FULUBHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The Principal Senior Civil Judge of Dhrangudhara court partially granted the electricity company's (PGVCL) claim for recovery of ₹21,915.95 in unpaid electricity bills against the defendant customer. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount plus 6% annual interest from the judgment date, rejecting the defendant's defense due to their non-appearance and failure to present counter-evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Nov-2025
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 670/2025
Court Judgment Summary The Principal Senior Civil Judge of Dhrangudhara court partially granted the electricity company's (PGVCL) claim for recovery of ₹21,915.95 in unpaid electricity bills against the defendant customer. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount plus 6% annual interest from the judgment date, rejecting the defendant's defense due to their non-appearance and failure to present counter-evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts