P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs HEIR OF LUHAR NATHABHAI MEGHAJIBHAI — 655/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN080022032025

Filing Number

655/2025

Filing Date

23-Jun-2025

Registration No

655/2025

Registration Date

23-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA

Judge

15-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra

    Adv. B J DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HEIR OF LUHAR NATHABHAI MEGHAJIBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court partially granted the electricity company's claim for unpaid electricity bills. The court ruled that the defendants (electricity consumers) must pay Rs. 5,059.57 with interest at 6% per annum from the judgment date, finding that the company proved the electricity consumption and non-payment through its records and witness testimony, while the defendants failed to present any defense despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 06-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 655/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially granted the electricity company's claim for unpaid electricity bills. The court ruled that the defendants (electricity consumers) must pay Rs. 5,059.57 with interest at 6% per annum from the judgment date, finding that the company proved the electricity consumption and non-payment through its records and witness testimony, while the defendants failed to present any defense despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case