P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs BHAVAYA AKBARHBHAI ABDULBHAI — 87/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 06th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJSN080011222025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
87/2025
Filing Date
19-03-2025
Registration No
87/2025
Registration Date
19-03-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA
Judge
17-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra
Adv. M B JHALA
Respondent(s)
BHAVAYA AKBARHBHAI ABDULBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 17-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 23-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 08-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 18-12-2025 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by Dy Engineer, PGVCL for recovery of Rs. 20,988.76 against judgment debtor Bhavaya Akabarbhai Abdulbhai for non-prosecution. The decree holder failed to take necessary steps to prosecute the petition despite multiple court hearings and opportunities, with no representation or explanation offered for non-appearance. Citing Supreme Court guidelines requiring execution proceedings to be completed within six months, the court found no useful purpose in keeping the petition pending and dismissed it due to prolonged inaction and lack of interest on the decree holder's part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by Dy Engineer, PGVCL for recovery of Rs. 20,988.76 against judgment debtor Bhavaya Akabarbhai Abdulbhai for non-prosecution. The decree holder failed to take necessary steps to prosecute the petition despite multiple court hearings and opportunities, with no representation or explanation offered for non-appearance. Citing Supreme Court guidelines requiring execution proceedings to be completed within six months, the court found no useful purpose in keeping the petition pending and dismissed it due to prolonged inaction and lack of interest on the decree holder's part. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts