P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs NITINBHAI RANCHHODBHAI KOLI — 143/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJSN080010662022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
143/2022
Filing Date
22-06-2022
Registration No
143/2022
Registration Date
22-06-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA
Judge
16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra
Adv. H K VYAS
Respondent(s)
NITINBHAI RANCHHODBHAI KOLI
Hearing History
Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 10-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 19-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 16-12-2025 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders ensuring disposal within six months, with presiding officers answerable to the High Court for non-compliance. The judgment reiterates the mandatory six-month deadline for execution proceedings as established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, emphasizing that execution cannot be delayed merely due to defendant's absence or technicalities unless justified by valid legal reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders ensuring disposal within six months, with presiding officers answerable to the High Court for non-compliance. The judgment reiterates the mandatory six-month deadline for execution proceedings as established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, emphasizing that execution cannot be delayed merely due to defendant's absence or technicalities unless justified by valid legal reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts