P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs NITINBHAI RANCHHODBHAI KOLI — 143/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJSN080010662022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

143/2022

Filing Date

22-06-2022

Registration No

143/2022

Registration Date

22-06-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA

Judge

16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 21,

Petitioner(s)

P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra

Adv. H K VYAS

Respondent(s)

NITINBHAI RANCHHODBHAI KOLI

Hearing History

Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT

10-02-2026

WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT

19-01-2026

WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT

16-12-2025

WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
ORDER

The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders ensuring disposal within six months, with presiding officers answerable to the High Court for non-compliance. The judgment reiterates the mandatory six-month deadline for execution proceedings as established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, emphasizing that execution cannot be delayed merely due to defendant's absence or technicalities unless justified by valid legal reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders ensuring disposal within six months, with presiding officers answerable to the High Court for non-compliance. The judgment reiterates the mandatory six-month deadline for execution proceedings as established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, emphasizing that execution cannot be delayed merely due to defendant's absence or technicalities unless justified by valid legal reasons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case