P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs GANCHI RAHIMBHAI NANJIBHAI — 63/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJSN080010382024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

63/2024

Filing Date

27-03-2024

Registration No

63/2024

Registration Date

27-03-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA

Judge

16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 21,

Petitioner(s)

P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra

Adv. K C BHATT

Respondent(s)

GANCHI RAHIMBHAI NANJIBHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

10-02-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

06-01-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

15-11-2025

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
ORDER

The court directed all High Courts across the country to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district judiciaries and issue administrative orders mandating that execution petitions be decided and disposed of within six months, with presiding officers held accountable to the High Court if deadlines are not met. The decision reiterates the mandatory six-month completion timeline established in the Rahul S. Shah case and requires High Courts to forward consolidated reports to the Supreme Court Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court directed all High Courts across the country to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district judiciaries and issue administrative orders mandating that execution petitions be decided and disposed of within six months, with presiding officers held accountable to the High Court if deadlines are not met. The decision reiterates the mandatory six-month completion timeline established in the Rahul S. Shah case and requires High Courts to forward consolidated reports to the Supreme Court Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case