P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs VAGHELA DAYABHAI MALABHAI — 59/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJSN080010362024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
59/2024
Filing Date
27-03-2024
Registration No
59/2024
Registration Date
27-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA
Judge
16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra
Adv. K C BHATT
Respondent(s)
VAGHELA DAYABHAI MALABHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS | |
| 06-01-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS | |
| 15-11-2025 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders ensuring disposal within six months, with presiding officers answerable to the High Court if deadlines are not met. This reiterates the mandatory six-month completion timeline established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, with provision for extension only upon valid legal grounds presented by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders ensuring disposal within six months, with presiding officers answerable to the High Court if deadlines are not met. This reiterates the mandatory six-month completion timeline established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, with provision for extension only upon valid legal grounds presented by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts