P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra vs MAYABHAI KHIMABHAI BHARVAD — 131/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJSN080007362023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
131/2023
Filing Date
12-04-2023
Registration No
131/2023
Registration Date
12-04-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHRANGADHRA
Judge
16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L.Dharangadhra
Adv. H K VYAS
Respondent(s)
MAYABHAI KHIMABHAI BHARVAD
Hearing History
Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 10-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 19-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT | |
| 29-11-2025 | WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders requiring disposal within six months from filing, with presiding officers held accountable to the High Court if deadlines are missed. This order reiterates the mandatory six-month timeline established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, emphasizing that execution petitions cannot be delayed merely due to appellant absence or procedural excuses without valid legal justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court directed all High Courts across India to collect data on pending execution petitions from their respective district courts and issue administrative orders requiring disposal within six months from filing, with presiding officers held accountable to the High Court if deadlines are missed. This order reiterates the mandatory six-month timeline established in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi, emphasizing that execution petitions cannot be delayed merely due to appellant absence or procedural excuses without valid legal justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts